The Deacon Project - Deacon Mark Asselin (Part Eight)

 

As mentioned earlier, this post and the next few, will highlight the thoughts of Deacon Mark Asselin on TWITTER.  Of course, there will be many in Archdiocese of Washington who will love him for it. 

Two things to note:

• These tweets are not necessarily in date order.
• If his tweet is unavailable, it is because he deleted it.

 

Notice in the last post, he is criticizing a bishop, who is telling the truth about Joe Biden.  

I wonder if his pastor or the folks down at Hyattsville will do anything or will they just look the other way.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Deacon Project - Deacon Mark Asselin (Part Seven)

 

As mentioned earlier, this post and the next few, will highlight the thoughts of Deacon Mark Asselin on TWITTER.  Of course, there will be many in Archdiocese of Washington who will love him for it. 

Two things to note:

• These tweets are not necessarily in date order.
• If his tweet is unavailable, it is because he deleted it.

 

So in his first tweet, do you notice how there is no blame on the Democrat side, even though Nancy Pelosi controls the House.

 

 

 

 

The Deacon Project - Deacon Mark Asselin (Part Six)

 

As mentioned earlier, this post and the next few, will highlight the thoughts of Deacon Mark Asselin on TWITTER.  Of course, there will be many in Archdiocese of Washington who will love him for it. 

Two things to note:

• These tweets are not necessarily in date order.
• If his tweet is unavailable, it is because he deleted it.

 

Note: In the first tweet he is criticizing Bishop Strickland of Texas.   Again, I thought that this was a no-no, but I guess as long as you can get away with it...

 

 

 

In this third tweet, we see that Deacon Mark likes to whip up the fear frenzy, which is typical of those on the left.  

 

The Deacon Project - Deacon Mark Asselin (Part Five)

As mentioned earlier, this post and the next few, will highlight the thoughts of Deacon Mark Asselin on TWITTER.  Of course, there will be many in Archdiocese of Washington who will love him for it. 

Two things to note:

• These tweets are not necessarily in date order.
• If his tweet is unavailable, it is because he deleted it.

 I wonder if the folks down at Hyattsville know about this.  But let's be honest, with +Gregory at the helm, it will either be ignored or encouraged. 

 

 

 

In the second image, he has never acknowledged any violence by BLM, ANTIFA or other Biden supporters.  However, even the hint from a Trump supporter is highlighted.  Talk about being selective.  

 

 

I have not seen what he talks about in the third image in the Catholic pro-life movement.  But then again, anything that puts abortion ahead of anything else, is wrong to Deacon Asselin. 

 

 

The Deacon Project - Deacon Mark Asselin (Part Four)

As mentioned earlier, this post and the next few, will highlight the thoughts of Deacon Mark Asselin on TWITTER.  Of course, there will be many in Archdiocese of Washington who will love him for it. 

Two things to note:

• These tweets are not necessarily in date order.
• If his tweet is unavailable, it is because he deleted it.

 

 

It should be noted that in the above image, I asked him to tell us what he found objectionable about the remarks by a SCOTUS justice.  No answer.   

 

 On the first comment in this image,  he accused Newt Gingrich of anti-Semitism because he mentioned George Soros.   Did not realize that Soros was part of the protected class.  

Note that Deacon Mark does not seem to like the First Amendment in regards to Fox News.   That is typical of socialists. 

The Deacon Project - Deacon Mark Asselin (Part Three)

 

As mentioned earlier, this post and the next few, will highlight the thoughts of Deacon Mark Asselin on TWITTER.  Of course, there will be many in Archdiocese of Washington who will love him for it. 

Two things to note:

• These tweets are not necessarily in date order.
• If his tweet is unavailable, it is because he deleted it.

Notice the second tweet, how he is criticizing a priest.  I thought that this was a no-no, unless you are criticizing a conservative cleric.  I wonder if the head of Deacons will do anything about it.  Probably not.